Everyone wants an AI employee. Everyone got an assistant.
An employee has a place in the process. An assistant doesn't.
Three ways to bring in AI. One of them holds.
Process first. Then hand over step by step.
Each step carries what the next one needs. Skip one, and the agent is back to guessing.
Steps, owners and handoffs get a form. The coordination leaves the inbox.
Systems and people dock on: stock, dates and documents arrive in the process and stay current.
Generate, distribute, remind, file. Deterministic, the same every time.
An agent drafts, assesses and prepares, under the same approvals as a person.
Every run adds to the record the next step is handed over from.
Find out which of your steps an agent could take today.
A discovery project maps how one process runs today and which of its steps an agent could take. Then the first process goes live in days, from €499 a month.
Price on request
the discovery project, as a package
From €499 a month
once the first process runs
What an agent can reach, and what it cannot.
Access
Only what its step hands it. Nothing else in your systems.
Credentials
They stay with the process. The agent holds none of its own.
Approvals
A person approves where the rule requires it, as a step in the process.
Record
Every agent step is logged as it happens, like every human step.
Data
Hosted in the EU, encrypted in transit and at rest. A dedicated installation on your own infrastructure is available.
Agents, the practical questions.
Four things, in this order: a defined step to take, the facts that step carries, permissions scoped to it, and a record of what it did. Work that runs on email and spreadsheets offers none of the four.
Only where you say so. You decide which steps an agent takes and which stay with a person, and approvals remain steps in the process, so people keep the final say by design rather than by policy.
That is the usual starting point, and it is where we start: a discovery project picks one process and it goes live in days, from €499 a month. Once a step is defined and carries its facts, an agent can take it over.
Copilot helps a person write. It does not move a case from one person to the next, hold an approval or leave a record of the run. Here an agent takes one step inside the process, under the same approvals as a person.
Its obligations depend on what an agent is used for. What the system contributes is what oversight needs in any case: people approve where the rule requires it, and every agent step is logged. Which obligations apply to your use is a question for your legal review.
Every agent step is logged as it happens, like every human step, so an agent's step is as traceable as an approval and an audit does not care which of the two ran it.
That is your decision and your process. What the system contributes is documentation: an agent takes defined steps, a person keeps the approval, and every step is logged, so what changes is written down rather than implied.
No. An agent step replaces a human step inside a process that already runs, and it acts through the same connected systems. Nothing is swapped out to make room for it.
It stays in your workspace, encrypted in transit and at rest, under strict access controls, hosted in the EU, and a dedicated installation on your own infrastructure is available. An agent sees the facts its step carries, nothing else.
Show us how you work today.
You'll know what to fix first.
A discovery call with Robert: thirty minutes on where coordination costs you most.